Volume 9, Issue 4 (1-2023)
Human Information Interaction 2023, 9(4): 37-52 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
babaee M, AZAGH H, YAZDANPANAH S. Measuring the information literacy of the Farhangian University student -teachers from six perspectives: review, knowledge of sources, dissemina-tion, diagnosis, flexibility, and information search. Human Information Interaction 2023; 9 (4)
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3052-en.html
URL: http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3052-en.html
, Department of Educational Sciences, Shahid Modares College, Farhangian University, Sanandaj, Iran
Abstract: (3025 Views)
Introduction: Information literacy is the ability to identify and critically evaluate information to solve problems in a specific field. The use of this procedure in the environment of universities and for students depends on their awareness of the many angles of information measurement in this field.
Methods: this study was to investigate the information literacy status of students and teachers of the Farhangian University of Kurdistan Province From six perspectives: information review, information source recognition, information dissemination, information recognition, flexibility, and information search. This research is practical and of a survey type and was carried out between January and March 2022. The study population consisted of all students of Farhangian University of Kurdistan Province in the academic year 2021-2022, which numbered over 1500 people. Using random sampling, 350 student-teachers were selected as a statistical sample. The data collection tool was a researcher-made 66-item information literacy questionnaire based on a 3-point Likert scale. The reliability of the questionnaire was 86% using Cronbach's alpha method. And for its validity, the views of university professors were used. Multivariate analysis of variance, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson torque correlation coefficient test was used to analyze the data using SPSS software.
Results: The results showed that there is a significant relationship between the components of information literacy of male and female student teachers (P = 0.0001). Therefore, in this study, gender has a small effect on the components of information literacy. Also, there is no significant difference between information literacy in its 6 components and the different educational disciplines of Farhangian University (P> 0.05). Finally, there is no significant relationship between information literacy in its 6 components and the age of Farhangian University students and teachers. Therefore, the information literacy situation of the students of the Farhangian University of Kurdistan is at an Intermediate level.
Conclusion: Information literacy is the set of skills and qualifications needed in the information society for teachers, therefore, by considering factors such as review, knowledge of sources, dissemination, recognition, flexibility, and search for information, it can be enriched. Building information literacy skills.
Methods: this study was to investigate the information literacy status of students and teachers of the Farhangian University of Kurdistan Province From six perspectives: information review, information source recognition, information dissemination, information recognition, flexibility, and information search. This research is practical and of a survey type and was carried out between January and March 2022. The study population consisted of all students of Farhangian University of Kurdistan Province in the academic year 2021-2022, which numbered over 1500 people. Using random sampling, 350 student-teachers were selected as a statistical sample. The data collection tool was a researcher-made 66-item information literacy questionnaire based on a 3-point Likert scale. The reliability of the questionnaire was 86% using Cronbach's alpha method. And for its validity, the views of university professors were used. Multivariate analysis of variance, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson torque correlation coefficient test was used to analyze the data using SPSS software.
Results: The results showed that there is a significant relationship between the components of information literacy of male and female student teachers (P = 0.0001). Therefore, in this study, gender has a small effect on the components of information literacy. Also, there is no significant difference between information literacy in its 6 components and the different educational disciplines of Farhangian University (P> 0.05). Finally, there is no significant relationship between information literacy in its 6 components and the age of Farhangian University students and teachers. Therefore, the information literacy situation of the students of the Farhangian University of Kurdistan is at an Intermediate level.
Conclusion: Information literacy is the set of skills and qualifications needed in the information society for teachers, therefore, by considering factors such as review, knowledge of sources, dissemination, recognition, flexibility, and search for information, it can be enriched. Building information literacy skills.
Keywords: Measuring information literacy, student-teachers, Farhangian University, six perspectives.
References
1. Ardalan, M. R., Abdulmaleki, J., Ahmadi, M., Hey-dari, N., & Amani, M. (2020). The role of
2. information literacy in lifelong learning of teachers of Smart schools in the fifth district of Tehran.
3. New Thoughts on Educational, 16(3), 117-144. (Persian).
4. Ardan, T. (2018). Statistics in simple language: in educational research, psychology and social
5. sciences. translated by Abdolvahab Khademi Shamami. Tehran: Ney Publications. (Persian).
6. Bakermans, M. H., & Ziino Plotke, R. (2018). As-sessing information literacy instruction in
7. interdisciplinary first year project-based courses with STEM students. Library & Information Sci-ence
8. Research, 40(2), 98-105.
9. Banihashem, K., Noshadi, S., Soltanizadeh, H., & Aliabadi, Kh. (2018). Comparison And Study Of
10. Media Literacy And Information Literacy Among Male And Female Students. Media Studies, 12 (39),
11. (Persian).
12. Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital litera-cies: a review of concepts. Journal of documenta-tion, [DOI:10.1108/EUM0000000007083]
13. 57(2), 218-259.
14. Brierton Granruth, L., & Pashkova-Balkenhol, T. (2018). The Benefits of Improved Information
15. Literacy Skills on Student Writing Skills: Develop-ing a Collaborative Teaching Model with Research
16. Librarians in Undergraduate Social Work Educa-tion. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 38 (5), 453-
17. Dehghan Harati, S. (2018). Comparative study of information literacy among Yazd University stu-dents
18. and Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sci-ences Yazd. Master Thesis, Educational Sciences,
19. Curriculum, Islamic Azad University, Ardakan Branch. (Persian).
20. Dizaji, A. J., Lotfi, A., & Galyani Moghaddam, G. (2019). Identifying Information Grounds of
21. Kurdistan University Postgraduate Students and Their Relation with Students' Information Literacy
22. Skills. Human Information Interaction, 6(1), 17-29.
23. Dolati, E. (2019). The relationship between infor-mation literacy and the effectiveness of primary and
24. high school principals in Famenin city. Master The-sis, Educational Sciences, Training and human
25. resource development, Payame Noor University, Hamadan. (Persian).
26. Hajnori, Z. (2019). The relationship between in-formation literacy and social intelligence with
27. organizational innovation of education teachers in Ardabil. Master Thesis, Executive Management,
28. Islamic Azad University, Germi Branch. (Persian).
29. Hassanzadeh, R., & Asadi, H. (2007). The effect of information literacy training on students' academic
30. performance. Educational Research, 3(11), 1-18. (Persian).
31. Kadkhoda, S., & Nastiezaie, N. (2022). The rela-tionship of teachers' information literacy with the
32. attitude to e-learning in the period Covid-19 pan-demic. Technology of Education Journal, 16(۱), 135
33. (Persian).
34. Karlova, N. A., & Fisher, K. E. (2013). A social dif-fusion model of misinformation and disinfor-mation
35. for understanding human information behaviour. Information Research, 18(1), 1-12.
36. Khademizadeh, Sh., Farajpahlou, A., & Bad-norooz, M. (2020). Using the information literacy
37. framework (2016) for evaluating information liter-acy of higher education students (case study: Sha-hid
38. Chamran University of Ahvaz). Journal of Library and Information Science, 10(1), 185-204.
39. (Persian).
40. Khajeh Ali Jahanatighi, Z. (2020). The relationship between information literacy and the field of study
41. of students of Marvdasht branch of Azad Universi-ty. Journal of Management and Education
42. Perspective, 1(2), 55-69. (Persian).
43. Majid, Sh., Foo, S., & Chang, Y K. (2020). Apprais-ing information literacy skills of students in [DOI:10.1108/AJIM-01-2020-0006]
44. Singapore. Aslib Journal of Information Manage-ment, 72(3), 379-394.
45. McGuinness, C. (2006). What Faculty Think-Exploring the Barriers to Information Literacy [DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2006.06.002]
46. Development in Undergraduate Education. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 32(6); 573-582.
47. Moghaddaszadeh, H., Yaminfirooz, M., & Alimo-hamadi, Kh. (2016). An investigation of the
48. relationship between information literacy skills and effectiveness of teachers: A Case study of primary
49. school teachers in Sari city. Library and Infor-mation Research Journal, 6(1, 11), 306-320. (Per-sian).
50. Najafpour Moghadam, P., Mohammadi, Z., & Raisifar, A. (2020). Structural modeling of the
51. relationship between information literacy and aca-demic achievement motivation with mediation of
52. academic self-efficacy in undergraduate nursing students of Ilam University of Medical Sciences.
53. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Sci-ence, 12(3), ۱-16. (Persian).
54. Niazazari, K., Barimani, A., Jowkar, A., & Rastegar Amrei, A. (2015). The relationship between
55. information literacy and academic performance of university students. Information and
56. Communication Technology in Educational Sci-ences, 6(1, 21), 5-17. (Persian).
57. Nikpour, A., Manzari Tavakkoli, A., & Ra-jaeinejad, M. (2012). The relationship between employees'
58. information literacy and organizational effective-ness In Kerman's Public organizations. Manage-ment
59. and Development Process. 25(3); 145-161. (Per-sian).
60. Ruppel, M., Winstead Fry, S., & Bentahar, A. (2016). Enhancing Information Literacy for Pre-service
61. Elementary Teachers: A Case Study from the United States. New Review of Academic Librarian-ship,
62. 22(4), 441-459.
63. Saleh, I. (2012). Media and Information Literacy in South Africa: Goals and Tools. Comunicar, 20(39), [DOI:10.3916/C39-2012-02-03]
64. Sharif Moghaddam, H., & Talebi, B. Z. (2005). Information literacy and the serious responsibility of
65. education. Development of Social Science Educa-tion, 7(4), 40-43. (Persian).
66. Wang, K., & Yang, Y. (2014). Strategies of Culti-vating information literacy for college English teachers [DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.945-949.3577]
67. based upon information technology. Advanced materials research, 945-949, 3577-3581.
68. Wen, J. R., & Shih, W. L. (2008). Exploring the in-formation literacy competence standards for
69. elementary and high school teachers. Computers & Education, 50, 787-806.
70. Yazdani, F. (2022). Relationship of information literacy and environmental knowledge, attitude and
71. practice of primary school teachers. Human In-formation Interaction, 8(4), 82-97. (Persian).
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
