امیدی، مصطفی؛ و جامهبزرگ، زهرا (1404). ارزیابی سواد هوش مصنوعی و تحلیل ساختار مفهومی آن در میان دانشجویان دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی. مدیریت، آموزش و توسعه در عصر دیجیتال، 2(2)، 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22034/hel.2024.2036769.1985
حاجینوری، لادن؛ و رمضانی، عباس (1403). بررسی وضعیت سواد کاربست و عوامل مؤثر بر پذیرش هوش مصنوعی در بین اعضای هیأت علمی. نامه آموزش عالی، 17(68)، 106-131. https://doi.org/10.61838/medda.192
Almatrafi, O., Johri, A., & Lee, H. (2024). A systematic review of AI literacy conceptualization, constructs, and implementation and assessment efforts (2019–2023). Computers and Education Open, 6, 100173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100173
Annapureddy, R., Fornaroli, A., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2025). Generative AI literacy: Twelve defining competencies. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 6(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3685680
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakcı, Ö., & Mariman, R. (2025). Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(26), e2422633122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422633122
Carolus, A., Koch, M. J., Straka, S., Latoschik, M. E., & Wienrich, C. (2023). MAILS – Meta AI literacy scale: Development and testing of an AI literacy questionnaire based on well-founded competency models and psychological change- and meta-competencies. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100014
Cheng, M., Lee, C., Khadpe, P., Yu, S., Han, D., & Jurafsky, D. (2026). Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions and promotes dependence. Science, 391(6792), eaec8352. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aec8352
Digital Education Council. (2025). Digital Education Council AI Literacy Framework. Retrieved from https://www.digitaleducationcouncil.com/post/digital-education-council-ai-literacy-framework
Doshi, A. R., & Hauser, O. P. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel content. Science Advances, 10(28), eadn5290. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn5290
Dubois, M., Ududec, C., Summerfield, C., & Luettgau, L. (2026). Ask don’t tell: Reducing sycophancy in large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.23971
Fanous, A., Goldberg, J., Agarwal, A. A., Lin, J., Zhou, A., Daneshjou, R., & Koyejo, S. (2025). SycEval: Evaluating LLM sycophancy. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.08177
Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. Oxford University Press. pp. 18- 42.
Freeman, J. (2025). Student generative AI survey 2025. Higher Education Policy Institute.
Han, B.-C. (2015). The burnout society (E. Butler, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
Han, B.-C. (2015). The transparency society (E. Butler, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
Haraway, D. (1985). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, 80, 65–108.
Hornberger, M., Bewersdorff, A., & Nerdel, C. (2025). A multinational assessment of AI literacy among university students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100371.
Jin, Y., Martínez-Maldonado, R., Gašević, D., & Yan, L. (2025). GLAT: The generative AI literacy assessment test. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100436
Jin, Y., Yang, K., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Gašević, D., & Yan, L. (2025). The agency gap: How generative AI literacy shapes independent writing after AI support. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.04398
Kestin, G., Miller, K., Klales, A., Milbourne, T., & Ponti, G. (2025). AI tutoring outperforms in-class active learning: An RCT introducing a novel research-based design in an authentic educational setting. Scientific Reports, 15, 17458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97652-6
Koch, M. J., Carolus, A., Wienrich, C., & Latoschik, M. E. (2024a). Meta AI literacy scale: Further validation and development of a short version. Heliyon, 10(21), e39686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39686
Koch, M. J., Wienrich, C., Straka, S., Latoschik, M. E., & Carolus, A. (2024b). Overview and confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis of AI literacy scale. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100310
Kosmyna, N., Hauptmann, E., Yuan, Y. T., Situ, J., Liao, X.-H., Beresnitzky, A. V., Braunstein, I., & Maes, P. (2025). Your brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.08872
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
Lee, E. H., Yin, Y., Jia, N., & Wakslak, C. J. (2026). Relying on AI at work reduces self-efficacy, ownership, and meaning while active collaboration mitigates the effects. Scientific Reports, 16, 13583. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42312-6
Lee, H.-P., Sarkar, A., Tankelevitch, L., Drosos, I., Rintel, S., Banks, R., & Wilson, N. (2025). The impact of generative AI on critical thinking: Self-reported reductions in cognitive effort and confidence effects from a survey of knowledge workers. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Article 1121, pp. 1–22). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713778
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
Miao, F., Shiohira, K., & Lao, N. (2024). AI competency framework for students. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391105
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
OECD & European Commission. (2026). Empowering learners for the age of AI: An AI literacy framework for primary and secondary education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/65cd27d4-en
OECD. (2026). OECD digital education outlook 2026: Exploring effective uses of generative AI in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/062a7394-en
Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen eighty-four. Secker & Warburg.
O’Dea, X., Ng, D. T. K., O’Dea, M., & Shkuratskyy, S. (2024). Factors affecting university students’ generative AI literacy: Evidence and evaluation in the UK and Hong Kong contexts. Policy Futures in Education, 24(1), 13–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103241287401
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown.
Pinski, M., & Benlian, A. (2024). AI literacy for users – A comprehensive review and future research directions of learning methods, components, and effects. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(2), 100062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100062
Schmarzo, B. (2023). AI & data literacy: Empowering citizens of data science. Packt Publishing.
Sharma, M., Tong, M., Korbak, T., Duvenaud, D., Askell, A., Bowman, S. R., Cheng, N., Durmus, E., Hatfield-Dodds, Z., Johnston, S. R., Kravec, S., Maxwell, T., McCandlish, S., Ndousse, K., Rausch, O., Schiefer, N., Yan, D., Zhang, M., & Perez, E. (2023). Towards understanding sycophancy in language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.13548
Stiegler, B. (2013). What makes life worth living: On pharmacology (D. Ross, Trans.). Polity.
WS, G. (1908). The probable error of a mean. Biometrika, 6(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331554
Vaccaro, M., Almaatouq, A., & Malone, T. (2024). When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nature Human Behavior, 8, 2293–2303. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02024-1
Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. University of Chicago Press.
Wei, J., Huang, D., Lu, Y., Zhou, D., & Le, Q. V. (2023). Simple synthetic data reduces sycophancy in large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.03958
White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2022). Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights: Making automated systems work for the American people. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/
Wright, D., Masud, S., Moore, J., Yadav, S., Antoniak, M., Park, C. Y., & Augenstein, I. (2025). Epistemic diversity and knowledge collapse in large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.04226
Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Sun, D., He, W., & Wei, Y. (2025). Navigating the landscape of AI literacy education: Insights from a decade of research (2014–2024). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 374. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04583-8
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press.
